- Rewards 40
Questions [4]
Questions they have asked
-
Section E Outcomes
I am going to tribunal shortly for B, F and I. I know section E outcomes are not appealable per se at tribunal, but is it possible to submit them and get them updated? If not when would this happen?
The AR is due about 3 weeks after tribunal, but I’m hoping just to roll the rulings of the tribunal over, rather than have a proper annual review and risk the LA trying to remove them!
Thank you! -
Advice on how to approach LA
Urgent advice on how to approach this please. Tribunal appeal in less than 2 weeks. LA have been awful. Not sent case review form or WD. 2 orders from Tribunal which they ignored and are currently barred.
Today, less than 8 days before tribunal they have sent WD. Also snuck in some late evidence. And asked for a meeting with me next week to discuss what I am appealing. The appeal was lodged 5 months ago and they have not wanted to work with me at all until today.
I have been working on WD with some help from a charity but am not sure it is quite right yet. I also don’t trust the LA now. I’m not sure whether to meet them or just say I’ll have an email discussion with them, or just do via WD?
I’m tempted to write a timeline of when info submitted, and my emails to them and oppose them putting in late evidence. Is this worthwhile? -
Can the LA amend section E outcomes without consulting parents?
We have tribunal against B, F and I in less than 2 weeks. The LA have sent in late evidence today (even though they are barred). They appear to have amended outcomes, without consultation. They also haven’t mentioned them in the email, just slipped them in.
My child is 16 (nearly 17) and at key phase transition. Lots of the outcomes refer to the end of post 16. Does this mean if they are achieved they will try to cease to maintain at 18?
Is it lawful to amend outcomes at this point? And without any input from parent? -
Is it possible to ask the FTT to clarify/review their decision?
I have just had tribunal last week and my YP (who is 16 )has been awarded EOTAS. The EP report suggested 15 hours of tuition at home. It also said a PA would be helpful for accessing the community, going to yoga/pilates and going on educational trips. The time for this wasn’t specified in the EP report.
When I worked on the WD with the help of Sossen, we amended PA to PA/TA/LSA, as I had heard LAs often won’t fund a PA and argue this is provided by social care. We asked for 15 hours a week for this. The LA agreed to this in the WD. However at the tribunal the panel were concerned that having a TA, with other elements of the package, would mean too many people being involved. They agreed to the 15 hours tuition but suggested the tutors might be able to take my YP out. They also asked where the 15 hours PA/TA/LSA had come from and when the EP said she hadn’t put 15 hours there they seemed to think (erroneously) none of that section had been recommended by the EP and removed it from the package completely.
This leaves my YP with no support in PFA or to access the community. My YP needs travel training, PHSE, help booking an appointment, going to a shop or cafe, exercise etc. Whilst the tutor might be able to do the odd educational trip to an exhibition they won’t be able to go out regularly. Her current English and Maths tutor said they wouldn’t be insured to do this and that you need special training to go on trips/ public transport.
So, can I write to the tribunal asking them to look at this part of the decision again? I thought the verdict was binding but it seems you can ask for clarification? If I had confidence in the LA I might try and negotiate it later, but they were awful during the process and I’m sure they wouldn’t agree to anything not specified in the plan. Thank you!
Answers [0]
Questions they have answered