- Rewards 32
Questions [3]
Questions they have asked
-
Can flexischooling (such as two days a week home learning) be an EHCP provision and what evidence (apart form professional reports) counts as reasonable evidence for it?
If a child spends considerable amount of time out of class, is this child eligible to receive the support needed (from parents) and use this time to study at home?
-
Is there guidance what evidence should tribunals disregard?
If evidence is 3/4 years old but has not been replaced by newer evidence, should this be automatically removed form EHC plans? If evidence is 3/4 years old and matches more recent evidence, should it always be taken out of an EHC plan because it is old? Are there instances where some of it should remain? For instance, evidence that shows progress in a certain area (or lack of progress) would need a start point and a current point in time. Thus, evidence regarding a start point in the past is needed in the plan as part of needs?
-
Interventions in section F - should the intervention and the assessment methods be described? Example: "Daily 1:1 mathematics booster planned by a teacher and delivered by TA. Effectiveness will be assessed in line with the National Curriculum framework and measured in year groups."
Most interventions within reports do not mention how to measure outcomes - should schools default to the National Curriculum descriptors in such cases? I am confused how the 1:1 ordinary available provision and the EHCP provision differ? If a child received a certain ordinary available provision and then an EHCP was issued, do they continue to receive the ordinary provision? The ordinary provision was more specific and clear than the EHCP provision.
Answers [0]
Questions they have answered